You are looking at : United States World › United States 1,702 data centers · 298 upcoming projects · edition ofJuly 19, 2026

Fleet figures

What public data says about data centers, aggregated site by site. Every figure is dated, sourced and recomputable.

The figure of this edition — on the selected territory

33%

of sites sit in a basin under high water stress or water crisis.

The fleet is here. The water is already under stress.

WRI Aqueduct 4.0 · n = 1,688 · United States · July 19, 2026 · v0.3.0

You are looking at

United States

ⓘ This is not a ranking. It is the photograph of a territory: what it already hosts, what it can still absorb, and what public files actually allow to know.

1. Can you still build here?

The fleet was built on land already taken — but connection queues keep growing.

33%

of sites sit in a basin under high water stress or water crisis.

What it meansCooling choices become a territorial question, not only a technical one.

WRI Aqueduct 4.0 · n = 1,688 · 14 sites with no published value — excluded and counted apart United States

92%

of the fleet is built on already-artificialized soil — not on farmland or natural land.

What it meansThe fleet grows mostly on already-transformed land — not every new project follows that logic.

Corine Land Cover (EEA) · n = 1,702 United States

All the figures (2 more)

46%

of sites face a high or critical grid-connection queue.

Grid operators' connection queues · n = 1,691 United States

13%

of sites border a protected natural area, within one kilometre.

Protected areas — EEA CDDA / Natura 2000 · n = 1,696 United States

2. What do we really know about the projects?

Operators disclose their capacity.

5%

of sites disclose their electrical capacity — the basic figure of any public debate.

What it meansThe basic figure of any public debate is usually available.

Operators' public disclosures · n = 1,702 United States

3. Where is the fleet heading?

The tracked fleet is already running — but what's coming doesn't always state its capacity.

83%

of the tracked fleet is already operating — we measure what exists, not only what is promised.

What it meansWe measure what exists first, not only what is promised.

ScoreMyDataCenter corpus — project status · n = 1,702 United States

99,890 MW

announced across projects not yet in service (298 projects — 213 do not disclose their capacity).

ScoreMyDataCenter corpus — announced & permitting projects · n = 298 United States

825

projects under citizen opposition or moratorium — recorded and sourced, never graded on that basis.

What it meansSourced facts, never a grade — context.

Watch layer — sourced facts, never a grade · n = 825 United States

4. What weighs most here?

The territory's constraints, ranked by the share of sites concerned — a descriptive ranking, never a grade.

1

Water

33%

of sites in high water-stress areas.

2

Protected areas

13%

of sites within 1 km of a protected natural area.

recomputed per perimeter: share of sites concerned by each constraint

5. Three projects that tell this territory

A mechanical, published selection — the most common profile, the most constrained, the best documented. Real situations behind the aggregates.

The most common profile

FiberNet Telecom Group New York (111 Eighth Ave) — New York (New York)

Site gradeC
  • Operational · capacity not disclosed
  • On already-artificialized soil

criterion: the territory's modal profile (status, grid, soil, most frequent grade)

View the fiche →
The most constrained

365 Data Centers Ft. Lauderdale (FLL) — Oakland Park (Florida)

Site gradeD
  • 3 cumulated territorial constraints
  • In a high water-stress area
  • Within 1 km of a protected area

criterion: highest cumulated territorial frictions in the perimeter

View the fiche →
The best documented

Apollo — Bowling Green (Ohio)

Site gradeC
  • Documentary confidence: low — 38%
  • Announced

criterion: highest documentary-confidence score

View the fiche →

6. How to read these figures?

No figure on this page is written by hand.

1,702sites analysed one by one22%average coverage — the gap is displayed100%recomputable (open data, grid and engine)1same method for every territory100%of figures linked to their sources

Figures change when facts change — never to fit the story.

See the full method →
ScoreMyDataCenter is an independent observatory. No operator funding. No proprietary data. No complacency.